ads

I mean I dont care how fucking sensational your personality is, this kind of shit is an outrage.

craigslist and a welfare check

Could it be that ugly faggots are more alpha?

she gets paid

>>2057473

Nah bro they are a couple.

Some men and women are simply, just not as shallow as you may think they are? I don't know.

inb4 shitstorm of men & women morals and/or how they look at the opposite sex. I said SOME, not all.

There's also ..
a) blackmail
b) prostitutes
c) desperation

Pick your poison, I guess. Besides, the guy isn't even as monstrous as you make him out to be. He has a small gut and the only thing relatively 'hideous' is his chest.

>Besides, the guy isn't even as monstrous as you make him out to be. >He has a small gut and the only thing relatively 'hideous' is his chest.

>>2057468
Maybe he's actually a nice guy and not a total judgemental prick like yourself

Feels bad man. I'm still a virgin.

some women just sleep with pretty much anyone who wants to.

The dude has the tits of somebody 100 pounds heavier than him, wtf. I mean, he's fat, but not THAT fat.

>>2057479

So says a guy on /fit/.

>>2057479

Go fuck yourself faggot, if chicks liked nice guys I would be a sex god.

>>2057468
thrust me that monster isn't getting any pussy...

the "girl" you see sucking is trap.

>>2057481
>>2057481
>>2057481
this, ffffffffffffffffff

well he's not balding like you OP. I would say hair is pretty important for getting women from 18-29

>>2057495

>>2057495


It's true, all kinds of bitches like my hair.

Girls go out with ugly faggots to make themselves feel better. That's all.

>>2057506
>suck off guy with better tits than you
>feel better about self

wat

attraction is objective, everyone has a different idea of what is hot

>>2057507
>>2057505
>>2057495
>>2057482
>>2057479

What the fuck is this shit /fit/. Why defend this fugly idiot.

>>2057512
>objective

>>2057468
>>2057470
>>2057471
>>2057473
>>2057478
>>2057482
>>2057489
>>2057491
>>2057506

Oh fuck it.
>this thread, including me.

>>2057512

>attraction is objective, everyone has a different idea of what is hot

You mean subjective, and I disagree also, we evolved dammit and most women like classically attractive people.

>>2057520
>>2057513

Oh God, I could post these pictures all day long in this thread.

>>2057522
>>2057518

Suck less cock faggot.

goddamn that guy must have zero testosterone

>>2057529

>>2057468
wait a minute

wait a minute

HOLY SHIT

I might actually know that guy.

Trust me on this one, if you think hes bad looking she is not any better.

So STFU and go EAT OATZ

>>2057534

He has a small cock.

Beeing a alpha male does not mean having physical prowess, muscular body or even beenig lean.

It means that you are at the top of the pack. It means that you have lots of power, in the eye of the eventual mate. Today this usually means beeing smart and daring.

Example: Bobby Kotick is more Alpha then this board combined.

>>2057556
Thats getting sucked, is yours getting sucked? Thought not

>>2057564
It's getting tugged, but that doesn't really count... you're right :(

>>2057569
I lol'd

>>2057559

To illustrate my point even further:

If all of you replaced your time spent working out at the gym with time spent reading a non-fiction/ non-strory book, you would be more attractive to the summed desire of all females.

>>2057559

>>2057575
I read the bible all the time though...

>>2057576

In the eye of the woman he is the most alpha male she could get (by her subjective criteria) - assuming she is not getting paid.

he probably has lots of these

>>2057468
So he is cut or uncut?

Just sayin cause I know everybody is thinking it.

The real question is why does this dude have those titties? come the fuck on

>>2057599
the messed up hormonal enviroment that stems from BEING FUCKING FAT (fat cells are endocrinologically active) sometimes makes for a more feminine fat storage pattern

>>2057599
I'm guessing he probably lost a lot of weight and it's loose skin, along with some gynecomastia.

>>2057599
>4chan
>asking y people have manboobies

>shemale?

>>2057575

I read non-fiction books dammit, psychology, philosophy, literature. I dress well, I eat right, I look good, handsome face and work out daily.

>>2057559

Has to be about the alpha mentality or cash. No other explanation.

>>2057575
I read books and papers during sets

>>2057626
and when I say during, I mean in between.
My english is bad

>>2057627
Good for you! Hi five!

>>2057626

Google scholar, and university login

brofist.jpg

>>2057628

>meathead

Enjoy your small gains.

>>2057630
Hi fiving people means small gains? Man i'm learning so much thanks bro. Hi five!

Actually, I am reading Joyce' Dubliners at the beginning of this one lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfKwPEB6n3g&feature=related

Also, FRqNK YqNG http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ_jNqt0kJY
HEGELIAN FLOOR PRESS

>>2057630
wtf are you replying to

>>2057633

>implying that Hegel's routine was anything other than metaphysical

>implying that Dubliners is not modernist garbage.

>>2057633
>>2057639

You both mad.

>>2057621

Alpha mentality alone will lead you to great things.
"The world gives way to the person who knows what he wants" (or something like that). It is a very desirable trait.

If money: What was desired before the invention of money? Or invention of commodities? Power i guess. If anyone looks for money in a mate, he usually looks for stability and power - which today usually means having money. Nothing bad about it really.

maybe the chick's ugly, you can't see her properly with a cock in her mouth and from that angle, dunno.

>>2057639
Dubliners? Really? I never read Hegel cause lol philosophy is for homos, but the Dubliners are a great read, and a prime example of craftmanship of the highest order. The artistic perspective switching at the beginning is simply astonishing.

>>2057643

Man that is so true. I'm going to write a paper about masculinity and power in contemporary society that hopefully incorporates Foucault, and Bourdieu. Shit will be cash. I'll name the paper something Alpha. Thanks for the brotivation bro.

>>2057652
I hope you get hit by a plane first

>>2057633
I want Frank Yang's body, but every time I watch one of his vids he makes me rage so fucking hard. It's like I wanna knock the shit out of him, then when he wakes up make passionate love to him.

>>2057656
considering the odds of being hit by a plane, does that mean you DON'T want him to die horribly before finishing his paper?

Never ever forget.

>>2057650

Most literature is philosophical, indeed thinking itself is basically a primordial philosophizing.

>The artistic perspective switching at the beginning is simply astonishing.

That is usually how modernist literature works, it is usually butthurt about technology/progress, much like romanticism. The paradox however is that modernist litreature, uses the same type of clean prose which codifies i.e. reinforces modernist/enlightenment rationality. The very thing it is against.

Thus it is always beautiful prose, but it lacks the authenticity, indeed it strives for authenticity but it never gets there.

Postmodern literature is basically the opposite, it more or less says that there are no great truths to discover, or uncover, and there are no authentic, 'true', or better modes of writing, expression, and living. Postmodernist literature just tells you to create your own god damn narrative.

>>2057475 He only has a small gut
GTFO

>>2057668
URGH IDC I JUST WANT HIM TO DIE FOR BEING HORRIBLE
stochasticans/statisticans
the worst kinda people, i tell ya
they can truly ruin your day

22 year old virgin with a bigger dick and a six pack reporting in.... I'm depressed now

>>2057674

Hence it is superior, imho.

>>2057491

It's true, I have the vid somewhere

>>2057491
least hes getting his dick wet. more than i can say about myself

>>2057650
>I never read Hegel cause lol philosophy is for homos, but the Dubliners are a great read, and a prime example of craftmanship of the highest order.
>but the Dubliners are a prime example of craftmanship of the highest order.
>prime example, highest order.
>I never read Hegel

>>2057674
>>2057633

Harsh tries to compete with collegefag, harsh loses. /The game

>>2057674
Well, you are talking themes and topics now (and stating the mainstream conceptions of each - one of the rather controversial topics I've been discussing lately are the reactionary tendencies of post modernism), I was talking craft.
It somewhat saddens me that I can't adequately express my opinions on literary topics for lack of terminology.

The Dubliners (The Dead) example I was talking about is mostly interesting from a perspective of craftmanship to me; I don't even care much about whatever JJ wants to tell me about, it's just that he's so horribly good at it. I'm not a l'art pour l'art guy all in all, but the beginning of The Dead just strikes me as being unusually well crafted.

>>2057695

If you like crafted prose, you should read an editors guide. If you like actually reading, and or engaging with a text, you should avoid literature, and philosophy.

P.s. I did not state the mainstream opinion of postmodernism. Postmodernism is a terrible word, and a seldom understood one. My point was that modernist litreature is its opposite. I.e. it is everything it tries not to be. I'm more of a pessimist is all.

>>2057686
>It's true, I have the vid somewhere

link plox?

>I don't even care much about whatever JJ wants to tell me about

>>2057701
Oh, I was more or less in agreement with you when it comes to modernism (though we could probably expand on the finer details of the topic). I just think that there are hidden depths to postmodernism (which I personally find to be amongst the more enjoyable ones amongst the periods of prose).

What do you mean by rather avoiding literature if one likes actually enganging with texts? Do you mean literature as in, the discipline (surely you do not speak of the art form)? If so, I disagree, because besides some tendencies to a purely formalistic view, most literary criticism I have encountered views that side of it all merely as a backdrop to what matters more to them.
Personally, I am actually coming from a hedonistic/cognitive background, with a healthy dose of cognitive neurosciences on top.

My inner english major is furious right now

>What do you mean by rather avoiding literature if one likes actually enganging with texts?

Well you said you liked the 'craftmanship', over the content. My point was simply if you like form over content then it turns out that it is you may infact be the postmodernist, and not I.

As for modern literary criticism it usually falls in like with dominant schools of thought. Someone has a Derridean reading of X, or a Lacanian or Marxist reading of Y, sometimes you get a mix of the two. Overall though you are right, it is basically opinion wrapped in some interpretive language (i.e. marxist etc.).

>I just think that there are hidden depths to postmodernism

Absolutely, but this is 4chan, and slogans/memes will always win out.

That being said, I think the greatest insight of postmodernist litreature, is that 'I am not even the one who reads'. The idea being that one not only creates there own meaning, but that the reading is always created by societal discourse, and certain discursive practices.

Thus it is as Derrida once put it, ' I am not even the one who says I".

>>2057736

syntax fail, its 3am here so bad luck.

Arguing on the internet is so lulzy

>>2057736
>>2057710

This is a fitness board. I don't even

>>2057736

I understand, but you should of just said. We create, and we are created, thus any 'text', be it literature, non-fiction or bag of protein power, can really should be considered 'artistic', as there is no distinction to be made.

>>2057743
>syntax fail, its 3am here so bad luck.
It's ok, I can't even spell at prime time

> My point was simply if you like form over content
And I don't. I was simply admiring a few pages of a piece by Joyce for its craftmanship. This does not mean that this is amongst my main evalutative criteria.
Also, where do you even get this dichotomy from? Cannot I appreciate both of these, craft and content, on their own terms, in parallel? Do I have to decide on one? That's not very post modern I must say.

>That being said, I think the greatest insight of postmodernist litreature, is that 'I am not even the one who reads'. The idea being that one not only creates there own meaning, but that the reading is always created by societal discourse, and certain discursive practices.
See, I hate postmodernist philosophy with passion and think Derrida should've been burned at the stake for being a horrible person. So my perspective on this may sound a bit archaic, naively modernist even, to you.
I think the fallacy in this statement is in that it is definitely I who reads; and that whatever we (and I, neuroscientist and all, feel myself to be rather included in that "we", and I would like to explicitely exclude postmodernist philosophy of the mind) will finally agree the person to be on is what is cocreated by social INTERACTIONS, of which discourse is a part.
I think that the concept of the I has to be changed fundamentally, into a more apersonal, distributive, self governing entity-nonentity even, but that this nonentity exists within the boundaries of the brain, not the society.

>I think that the concept of the I has to be changed fundamentally, into a more apersonal, distributive, self >governing entity-nonentity even, but that this nonentity exists within the boundaries of the brain, not the society.

I couldn't agree with you more. In fact modern phenomenology, especially of the Merleau-Ponty variety says the same thing. In fact I wrote a very bad paper on embodied cognition and A.I, it got a low A, but I enjoyed writing it.

Check out embodied cognition, and phenomenology in the philosophy of mind if your are interested. Cognitive science is basically representational. This is deeply problematic.

>>2057468
>>2057468
>>2057468
>>2057468
>>2057468
>>2057468
>>2057468
It's called 'money'

>>2057820

Also be careful with Derrida, he, like Nietzsche are infinitely more complicated thinkers, then most people make out and they certainly cannot be dismissed outright simply because they sound strange or say weird shit.

>>2057827
>>2057827
He doesn't look like he has it

>>2057820
I did a lot of reading and even a presentation on modern philosophy of the mind. I think it is, for most parts, shit. Utter shit.
The thing is that the cognitive neurosciences can easily explain all of the philosophical/experiental data safe for qualia, and that the philosophical/experiental tradition cannot explain even a fraction of the neurocognitive data.

>>2057468

i bet he has a talent you don't, oh, and he's a ginger fuck.

>>2057835
>The thing is that the cognitive neurosciences can easily explain all of the philosophical/experiental data safe for qualia, and that the philosophical/experiental tradition cannot explain even a fraction of the neurocognitive data.

He has man boobs, maybe she has a fetish for creepy fucks? I mean theres a fetish for everything nowadays

>The thing is that the cognitive neurosciences can easily explain all of the philosophical/experiental data safe for qualia, and that the philosophical/experiental >tradition cannot explain even a fraction of the neurocognitive data.

I think qualia is bullshit anyway. As I said though, cog-sci in the philosophy of mind depends on representationalism, as far as I can tell Heideggerian/Husserlian critiques plague it. Indeed Dreyfus argues that that the practical failure of A.I. is in fact the theoretical failure of cogsci/rationalistic models of the mind.

I'm not sure though, I'm more continental then analytic. So I'm bias. Also keep in mind that most scientific aspects tend to fail the embodied experience of 'subjects'. It may well be that light particles hit my 2d retina and convert it into a 3d image in my mind, but that is not how it is experienced (I think the qualia people stole this concept from phenomenology). This was the insight of phenomenology, which basically concludes that the naturalistic/scientific explanations of mind/body/world are dogmatic, and built upon equally dubious metaphysical foundations.

All depends if your a realist or an anti-realist, or if you have a hard-on for science or not.

>>2057830
>Also be careful with Derrida, he, like Nietzsche are infinitely more complicated thinkers, then most people make out and they certainly cannot be dismissed outright simply because they sound strange or say weird shit.
More complicated than what? And that they may be multilayered and complicated does not make it impossible for them to be simply wrong (which would be my point), though they try their hardest to go beyond propositionality and therefore, being even talked about in terms of right and wrong (only usefull and useless, and boy are they not).

>even talked about in terms of right and wrong (only usefull and useless, and boy are they not).

This is true of Nietzsche at least, or though he would say 'healthy' or 'unhealthy'.

Derrida wouldn't commit himself either way lol.

>>2057856
>I think qualia is bullshit anyway.
What? It's there, it's in the end just a reformulation of Decartes' famous (sic)*. The very fact that you experience (a) you as experiencing something as something is at the heart of qualia, and how can you discuss this away?

>As I said though, cog-sci in the philosophy of mind depends on representationalism
Philosophy of the mind is shit.

I don't think our data is dogmatic. It is, most of all, there. You can try pointing out the dogmatisms in our interpretations, but the data is the data, and it has to be explained in some way. And pointing at holes in our current interpretations does not change that the data is there, and that philosophy of mind sucks at explaining it.
*can you do your own (sic)?

God damn it is nice to know there are intelligent people on the internets. I think I might sex you harsh.

>>2057870
ARE YOU/DO YOU LOOK LIKE CARRIE FISHER?

Also, it's mostly that you've caught me at one of the about 3 subjects that I know a bit about.

>>2057475

Not that bad? I'm a walking poster child for the personality over looks ordeal. I've had some hot broads.

but that guy looks like a fucking goonie. :O

>>2057869

>You can try pointing out the dogmatisms in our interpretations, but the data is the data

Data is meaningless without interpretation, simple as that - even what constitutes 'data', as 'data' depends on a certain presupposed criteria.

As I said though, in the end these questions come down to realism/anti-realism, people either have an erection for science or they do not. There are good arguments on either side. As a philosophyfag though I'm more inclined to anti-realism.

>philosophy of mind sucks at explaining it.

Again if you want a philosopher to explain data, you are approaching it all wrong. A philosopher can really only tell you what you can and cannot know, and what you can or cannot verify, and or explain. The scientist will just plug away working with the same model, collecting data, punching in numbers, then realize that none of there models work etc.. etc.. which is what happend in modern artificial intelligence. It is then that the philosopher steps in and tells you that your results are wrong, precisely because your model of what it is to be a human/perceiver is wrong.

i have no fucking idea what is going on in this thread. i went to college and i still dont understand a fucking word of this thread

Dont worry bro. Philosofags are not human.

>>2057879
Oh, I try to be open for both, in general. I definitely go with the whole post modernist criticism of science up to a certain point; we are mostly likely wrong, as we can see by the fact that up to now, we've always been wrong; what we will think of today will be the bad science of tomorow. My science is biased by the culture I come from, that's, man, that's rather empirical even. That's not even an interpretation, that's data.
And on the other hand, I don't think anybody is getting anybody out of philosophy of mind, and there is a lot to be gotten out of the brain, out of researching it, interpreting it, and we've collected fantastic observations that are in dire need of explanation. It's simply too fascinating to not start now, even though we'll be wrong, even though we'll always see through a mirror darkly, but that's what we do - we try telling a story, and all stories are, in a sense, lies (or rather fictional), but we gotta tell them, because otherwise, there wouldn't be anything; and the story philosophy of mind is telling sucks, major plot points, tiny budget, you don't even see anything new, just trying to defend the old, and neurosciences got a fascinating story, and it's mostly coherent, and the special effects are bombastic.

I follow the philosopher, or rather, the historian of science up to the point where he shows me that I am probably wrong in my interpretation. But now he also tries his own interpretation, and it's horrible. So I keep doing my stuff, because it might be wrong, but it's a good try.

>>2057903

Fucking truth man. I'm actually trying to bridge the two. In fact at my uni we are looking very closely at mirror neurons and contemporary phenomenology. They are remarkably compatible.

Anyway harsh, I gotta drink some mother fucking milk and go to bed - was quite epic talking to you though.

>>2057896
Congrats, that means you had a real major in college. Like engineering. Where you learned something instead of sitting around smoking weed and making up completely unverifiable bullshit

this thread is about what again?

>>2057924
>we are looking very closely at mirror neurons
Mirror neurons in humans: Consisting or confounding evidence?
Luca Turella a, Andrea C. Pierno a, Federico Tubaldi a, Umberto Castiello a,b,*
a
Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padova, Italy
b
Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey TW20 OEX, UK
Accepted 12 November 2007
Available online 21 December 2007
Abstract
The widely known discovery of mirror neurons in macaques shows that premotor and parietal cortical areas are not only involved in
executing one’s own movement, but are also active when observing the action of others. The goal of this essay is to critically evaluate the
substance of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) studies whose aim has been to
reveal the presence of a parallel system in humans. An inspection of this literature suggests that there is relatively weak evidence for
the existence of a circuit with ‘mirror’ properties in humans, such as that described in monkeys.
Ó 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Mirror neurons; Imitation; Action observation; fMRI; PET; Humans; Macaque monkey; Inferior frontal cortex; Parietal cortex; Premotor
cortex

:)

Good night, i rather enjoyed it myself, too.

PROTIP: NONE OF YOU ARE ALPHAS IF THIS PICTURE OFFENDS YOU, IT'S SIMPLE, ANYONE CAN GET PUSSY

YOU ARE JUST HEAVILY BUTTHURT

>>2057513
WHY NOT DEFEND HIM? DO YOU FEEL BUTTHURT THAT YOUR LOOKS DOES NOT GET YOU WHERE YOU WANT?

YOU ARE A MAN WHORE

>>2057957
>Alphas

Lmao, faggots still believe in taht bullshit?

You know what

IM MAXIMUM GOA'ULD MODE

YEA BITCHES INFINITE LIFEPSAN NON STOP CAPS NON STOP BITCHES N HOS

YE BBITCHES

Are you goa'uld yet?

>>2057961
YOU OBVIOUISLY DONT KNOW ABOUT GETTING ON TOP OF THE PACK

I NEED A LINK TO THE ALLEGED VIDEO AND OR MORE PICS NAOOOOO PLOX

>>2058043
Iodine

Makes me sad too bro.

His penis is the size of a mini pritstick for christ's sake.

>>2058048
Thank god i'm not the only one that knew that, feels good man.

It's sad that men think that having a sexy body is all that attracts women. Try being intense and complicated. Women like intrigue.

>>2058256
SO WHAT? ARE YOU ONE OF THOSE FAGGOT THAT THINKS THE PENIS SIZE MATTERS FOR SUCCESS IN LIFE?

APPARENTLY YOU ARE PART OF THE LOSER, AND FROM YOUR COMMENT IT SEEMS THAT THE SIZE OF YOUR PENIS IS RELATIVELY BIG

DID IT MATTER IN THIS CASE? NO

ENJOY YOUR LOSS CLOSET HOMOSEXUAL

>>2058263
>>2058048
Yeah. No one seems to have realised. Not sure I should spoil it, everyone seems to be having a wonderful time discussing philosophy when little do they know... Little do they know...

>>2058317

>>2058305
Yyyeah I've kind of involuntarily been trying the intense and complicated thing all my life and I can tell you it's never really worked for me. Most girls don't give a fuck about general relativity theory.

>>2057584
He said non-fiction, fantasy doesn't count.

>>2058327

Yes we do, but the point still remains that dog ugly faggots get girls, sometimes they even get really got girls.

lurker who got his girlfriend when he was still a chubby bastard, here.

it's the same way most fatties score the womens: they are funny and make the girls laugh until their stomachs ache.

you, unfortunately are not.

being /fit/ is only about 50% of the equation.

>>2058381

Get fucked lardo, when you die at 65, I'll still be able to squat your fucking coffin. Protip: i'll still be around.

>I'll still be able to squat your fucking coffin

I lol'd

>>2058372
CashMoney. Luck. Found a girl who actually goes for the personality. Fuck if I know. Stop being so jealous of ugly fucks, atleast you look better than them. Well, probably not.

>>2058317
Hahahaha chill bro I wasn't insulting *you* was I?

19 YO, still a virgin.
I cope with it by lifting heavy and watching cartoon violence (AKA anime)

>>2058381
i'm in shape and i can tell you it's less than 50%. none of the girls i've dated considered me being in shape anything more than a sort of nice side bonus. i do have a good face though and that might be getting me more mileage than i know. it really seems to be all about being fun and un-needy, and good in bed

>>2058399

lol, and my coffin will have an effigy of the last chick I banged on it. while you angrily do squats facing a mirror and wonder how I got so much pussy on 4chan.

>>2058437

>implying that I wouldn't fuck your corpse.

>>2057468

Drunk slut,

/Thread

>>2058431
who needs to cope? damn i didnt even WANT to get laid until i was 20, took about a year of awkwardness but i havent been without a partner for very long since then and it's been years. it's not a fucking huge deal and some people get started later than others. some of us actually go through DEVELOPMENT as we get older instead of coming out as a little fully formed dickwad and just getting larger and more retarded as seems to be the norm

>>2058486

is gay.

>>2058399

haha, I can see this guy asking a girl out as if she owed him a lay because he got cut.

"what do you mean I'm not your type!? I did fucking 30 squats a day for two fucking years!"

>>2058486
I meant it as in "I keep my sex-drive in check".
If I wanted to have sex I would've done so by now.
But sadly my nihilist attitude, my arrogance and my narcissistic demeanor won't allow it.
>>2058545
Don't care about size or looks, all I want is raw strenght.
It's my obsession

Now if you'll excuse me, I need to catch up on some Slayers.

waaaaaaaaaaait a minute

>>2057489 Go fuck yourself faggot, if chicks liked nice guys I would be a sex god.

There's a difference between a nice guy and a pussy. You can be nice while not being a pussy.

>>2058658


lol'd hard

>>2058658
/thread

>>2058658

PAHAHAHAHA

over 9000/10 op

best troll thread in ages

>>2058658

See, you still gotta look like this to get girls.

this needs to be archived so future generations can know what it is to troll

>>2058658
SUCCESSFUL TROLL IS SUCCESSFUL.
It was obvious.

OP here. I set this little bad boy up 5 hours ago. Feels good man.

>>2058725
This is god tier trolling. Way to be.

>>2058725
what the shit man.
what is this? a shemale?

>>2058658

OP I would suck your dick. I see you also set this badboy up in /fa/.

/bows

well because i bet he is kind, funny and sweet guy, while you spend all your time in gym and your basements working out, a guy like this goes and lives a social life.

>>2058754

I lol'd

Well done.

Well, now we'll see this posted again and again.

>>2057468
>>2058658

THIS IS TROLLING AT ITS FINEST. YOU ARE THE ALPHA. YOU ARE THE OMEGA OP.

I SALUTE YOU.

>>2058658

o gawd

>>2058772
Now that you are used to it...

This kinda shit inspires me. If this guy can accomplish this, assuming we're on the same planet with the same laws of physics, then that means I should have a different playboy playmate for each day of the week.

>>2058818

>shit is still trolling.

they are brothers.

>>2058843

wait, wat?

srs guys if I found out this was wincest. I'm gonna cum in my mouth.

This guy is ugly just like a 4channer. The difference is that he ignores his ugliness, is confident and gets women. Meanwhile, 4channers look at their bodies, and because they don't look like Pitt from Fight Club, conclude they are hideous and never leave the house.

>>2058317
Micropenis detected.

You're still posting?

Posting about epic head.

>>2057468
He's probably in a shitty local band, and she'll be an idiot who subscribe mind, soul and evidentially body to that particular subculture.

I have seen so many hot scene chicks hooking up with the most pathetic male specimens just because they had a stupid fringe, tight pants and piercings.

The heads just keep trolling in

that's one hot trap and one not-so-hot trap having sex.

>>2059029
She's a shemale you dumbass. Lurk the rest of the thread before posting. You've been trolled.

>>2059029
it's a dude.
>>2058658

>>2058991

>>2059061

>implying that everyone on /fit/ hasn't already been trolled.

>>2057468

ITT - HOW CUMZ I WORK OUT N GIRLZ DON'T PAY ME ATTENSHUN N THIS GUY IS OOGLY AND DOESN'T DO ANYTHIN AND HE GETS ALL THA GIRLS WHAT AM I DOIN RONG????

This thread.

>>2059087
hurh hurh

>>2059087
Easy on the capslock there buddy

>19 YO, still a virgin.
I cope with it by lifting heavy and watching cartoon violence (AKA anime)

>and watching cartoon violence

>cartoon violence

>still a virgin.

I'm by no means as fit as some of the individuals on /fit/ and I must say I honestly thought that was a shemale with implants, that dude is fucking disgusting.

did someone say alpha male?

>>2059146

OK THOSE 2 ARE TRAPS DONT KNOW IF IT HAS ALREADY BEEN SAID! THERE NOW FEEL BETTER

>>2059539
Rest of set plox

>>2058658

>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491
>>2057491

he said it first..

>>2058658
>>2058658
>>2058658
great success

archive??

[spoiler]She's 'getting back' at her ex with these photos[/spoiler]

>>2058658
HOLY FUCKING SHIT

When I ONLY saw the OP's pic, I thought to myself "I bet that girl is a trap" and I don't fucking know why. God damn, that is either one huge coincidence or I have telepathy.

>>2058658
NICE TROLLIN

>>2059539

Girl's name?

>>2059769

>girl

it's a man baby

gj op i haven't laughed that much in a while, one of the all time greatest troll threads.

archive dis shit

>>2059716

OR you've been there and done that.

http://4chanarchive.org/

4 more requests needed.

>>2059801

requesting archive for justice, aint loled so hard in some time.

how do i request archive?

>>2057706
the PEREGRINE FALCON HAS SPOKEN

http://4chanarchive.org/

Click request interface > scroll down and pick /fit/ > type in 2057468 >submit

It has been done

A+

I didn't lose till >>2059096

>>2057468
Wow you guys, that's Iodine sucking the cock.
She's a trap at chansluts.com
She's been in many orgies with other traps

>>2059951
he*

>>2060032
She*

Sure is /r9k/