>>7434129 I think /q/ has become the worst board on 4chan
Typical /q/ >guys somebody posted ponies on /b/ again >guys somebody posted a non video game thread on /v/ again >guys somebody posted a korra thread on /co/ again >guys somebody posted a meme I dont like again
>>7434338 I actually go those boards besides /b/. Moot making /mlp/ took care of the pony spam everywhere but when somebody uses a pony reaction image people go to /q/ and complain. If there is a thread that gets posted a lot, even if its on topic and they dont like they go to /q/ to complain. /q/ is one big "stop liking what I dont like" board
Though I would vote Republican if there was a candidate I could actually stand behind, Romney was just another Jew shill. The only candidate I can concieve getting off my ass to vote for is Ron Paul, but he has no chance of winning unless he bends over and kisses the Jews' ass. I want the current establishment to burn, we need a revolution. A White Nationalist revolution.
>>7434074 >implying UK and Australian media isn't the same >implying that even then, there aren't more than only these three countries withhold truth >implying
There's an image of the counter to her logic that involves dressing as an ATM machine and using a riot shield or something. Cannot find it for the life of me, though.
>>7434605 He's a partisan fuckhead. Look no further than his butthurt rant after the election about how Gary Johnson voters are dumb to get a solid idea of the stuff that man is made of.
>>7434516 I raged hard, I posted something about how that is feminist propaganda and they need to stop whining. I'm probably gonna get hate responses for the next couple years.
For me it was seeing an abc 20/20 story about taxes 10 years ago while flipping channels. It's not really a "red pill" video, but it got me thinking about politics and how it impacts my life and how americans pay taxes on pretty much everything from water to toothpaste to gas to alcohol. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-qmNrX9klM
>>7435061 like when they shilled for tobacco companies by playing ten minutes' worth of a libertarian talk show host claiming secondhand smoke is as harmless as orange juice.
>>7435186 > implying "secondhand smoke" is harmful
Liberals have tried to dress up their attempts to control our lives in terms that make it sound like they're helping people, but really it's just bullshit that they use to justify more government telling us where we can go, what we can do, when we can do it, etc.
>>7435285 Now that's just a fucking stupid line of thinking. Thousands of scientific articles cannot be wrong. Secondhand smoke is harmful, you stupid idiot.
I had to swallow a very bitter pill in 2010 and 2011 when Obama whom i voted for to end the wars and scale back the military expanded the wars and sent more troops to the war zone in Afghanistan. I guess it was around the time when he received his Nobel peace prize, which he should have never received from my point of view. There are a couple of good videos about this, detailing his flip flopping and his hypocrisy. I can't find the one i'm looking for, but this one does a good job http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihBoSPSocKs
Actually no, only one "scientific" article has supported secondhand smoke as harmful, and that was the one in the 70's which was debunked as fraudulent.
The death statistics for secondhand smoke are intentionally misleading, they count anyone who dies of natural causes like cancers in a home with a smoker in it as a death by secondhand smoke.
>>7435478 For starters? Rothbard, Mises, Hayek (all of them not strictly AnCaps, but they give you the idea of how a system works best without government interference)
Meh the jewish conspiracy videos in here are not particularly enlightening. In the end it doesn't matter who is behind the curtain and making the puppets dance. First and foremost you have to make people aware of the terrible plot of the play, how it is a distracting from real issues and the real world and then you have to point out the string and the wooden moves of the puppets before people will believe that there's a man behind the curtain.
>>7435843 The first step is survival, that is maintaining the ability to organize, voice opinions and spread ideas. Without the internet and a free flow of information and ideas, there's no future for any movement that seeks to alter and abolish the status quo.
>>7435999 I love a good conspiracy theory as the next person. But I was diagnosed with major depression in 2010, when I was a neo-marixst liberal retard. Since I've had psychotherapy and been on anti-depressants for almost three years, I've gone from Neo-Marxist dumbshit to a minarchist border-lining AnCap.
and my psychologist always challenged me to think for myself which ultimately lead to where I am now. I don't think it's some pro-government conspiracy, otherwise they would have nurtured my neo-marxist beliefs and not let me become almost an anarchist
>>7436372 Nobody is saying that these drugs do not have a beneficial effects on some people, but the reality is that they prescribed to people who are healthy, who go through a divorce or are angsty and insecure teenagers. It's not even a conspiracy, it's just the pharmaceutical industrial complex trying to sell their products and the psychiatrists and doctors trying to make a buck. it's a classic conflict of interest, if they did the right thing and tell you to exercise and stay away from sugar and starches they would go out of business. This is why we have a treatment centered medical sector instead of a cure centered health sector.
>>7436372 What does taking drugs even have to do with your changing your political ideology? I don't really a see connection here. Btw, i hope you're away aware that by taking psychotropic drugs you have not cured yourself, but have eliminated or covered up the sympytoms. You become addicted and you will go through withdrawal if you ever try to stop taking them. In addition to that they have drastic long term effects that plunge you back into depression / create new social disorders that will have to be treated with additional drugs. There is no such thing as chemical imbalance, as these fucks would like to have you believe. It is voodoo science and these pills will destroy your mental health in the long run.
He's lord of this world. How's that workin' out? Lucifer hates mankind because God loves us. He is using you. Listen to the still, small voice inside of you.
>>7436504 I agree with you that anti-depressants really aren't for people who aren't majorly depressed. Otherwise I would guess they would actually lead you toward apathy/depression
>>7436864 Yeah, but you're going to have to take these drugs for the rest of your life, and as i said they WILL create additional problems that you will have to deal with in the future. They do not cure your depression they merely treat it. Also, one of the mistakes you make is that you assume that there are no alternatives to pills, which are harmful to your health. You're not cured, you're an addict. Look for healthy alternatives.
>confirmed for never had depression I never considered myself depressed, but i was unhappy and miserable for at least three years from 15-18 years old I didn't have friends, i didn't go out and wasted away in my room playing videogames and watching porn. it all changed when i met my girlfriend and started exercising and eathing healthy.
>Libertarian Propaganda It doesn't get more libertarian than this, someone had put it in his battle.net profile in starcraft many years ago. It's basically the essence of libertarianism and is responsible for my political awakening. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muHg86Mys7 I've been a libertarian ever since.
>>7437200 actually no, my doctor and psychiatrist said I will be off them within 18 months, with a reduction in the amount I take within those 18 months.
You won't know you're depressed until you are told to take a survey on your emotions etc. I didn't know I was depressed, i thought considering suicide on a daily basis was normal
>>7437232 That doesn't explain why I get light headed if I don't take them in a 24 hour period.
That doesn't explain why if I get drunk I have wild mood swings
>>7437331 lol somehow my copy&paste didn't work http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=muHg86Mys7I >>7437342 How did you even watch it, the link leads nowhere. Are you a bot or something?
>>7436372 People like you should really stop reading politics / identifying with some political ideas. I've seen far worse nutcases, but I would say you're pretty fucked up in the head and it's too late. I mean brain damage type of damage that cannot be reversed.
>>7437405 never had a problem with alcohol until i took these. I'm not normally an emotional drunk. I'm normally a really happy high in the sky drunk. Not going from happy to annoyed to flat out angry in a matter of minutes
>>7437382 >my doctor and psychiatrist said I will be off them within 18 months Ha Ha! That's part of the sales pitch. Trust me, once you stop taking them / reduce the amount you plunge back into depression worse than before. And they're gonna be like "Oh that's unfortunate, here's some other pill that will help you cope with the side effects" ...and it's downhill from there. You've been had, son.
>>7437382 >You won't know you're depressed until you are told to take a survey on your emotions I'm pretty sure that i can self-diagnose myself as depressed when i have suicidal thoughts. I don't need a pill pusher to tell me that.
>>7437382 >That doesn't explain why I get light headed if I don't take them in a 24 hour period. Dude! If that's not a tell-tale sign of addiction, i don't know what is.
If they're trying to gain acceptance for insanity... then... this horrifying atrocity that is "social justice" must be stopped immediately. If we allow acceptance of anti-logic to take hold, then truly we have all lost.
>>7437597 you really have no conceivable idea about major depression do you?
This is the fucking thing, my psychiatrist educated me on the difference between emotional depression and major depression.
you can't be claiming a hur derp corporate conspiracy when he's educating me on the treatment he's giving me. He also lays everything in my hands as to how long I take medication and how much. It's literally left up to me on the medication stage.
I even turned down medication when I was first diagnosed.
>>7437585 >You don't know a thing about mental illness do you? No, but i do have experience with doctors and symptom treating drugs.This is their modus operandi. They don't make money from seeing you, or giving you advice. They make money from prescribing drugs. If you see a doctor with a fat car and a big house, you can be sure that he's prescribing drugs left and right for all sorts of nonsense.
>>7437732 >yfw my therapist used to go out to night clubs with me to get me to pick up chicks (as apart of CBT) >didn't ask me to pay for those times >only paid him when I saw him in his office
>>7437597 fuck doctors, they only care about money, bro im going to give you the best piece of advice you will ever get, you can run from your problems and they will eventually catch you, or you can stand and fight/confront them, and then you will actually have a chance at winning
>>7437732 Pretty much this. My friend deals benzos, he goes to over 5 doctors. Since the doctors don't have shared database of him, they have no idea what he has been prescribed so he keeps getting opioids prescribed and deals them on the street.
I always wondered do doctors actually get money for prescribing certain brands to their patients? There's a whole soda market to choose from, basically you can have the same exact substance under 10 different names. For example Alprazolam is called Xanax in USA, but in Europe it's known as Xanor and they are the same drug 100%.
>>7437829 You took the bait and came back, didn't you? It obviously worked. You don't seem to know how much a long term patient is worth. He gets a percentage for every single prescription. Over 2 years that can mean hundreds and thousands of dollars. I'm not saying that it isn't possible that this is the right path for you, or that this particular drug isn't helping you, i'm just saying there is no (zero) incentive for him not to prescribe drugs.
>>7437895 >implying I didn't get red pill'd be an AnCap in that time >implying the reason for my diagnosis wasn't the repression by religion
>>7437910 any which way you want to spin a real life circumstance to fit your pre-conceived idea about something you have no knowledge/experience of. Is fine bro, I won't stop you.
>>7437876 They are allowed to get kickbacks from medical companies. But i'm pretty sure this is highly regulated and there's a limit. I do know that the pharma industry likes to turn their informational conferences where they pitch their products into caviar vacations with gift baskets etc. to get doctors to come out and attend them.
>>7437965 pre-conceived idea about something you have no knowledge/experience of See >>7437732 It doesn't matter what kind of doctor he is, if he is licensed to prescribe certain types of drugs he is also incentivized financially to prescribe as many as possible. If your doctor is different, okay. But i don't think it's very likely.
>>7438117 >hes qualified to prescribe drugs >ITS AN OUTRAGE HE'S PRESCRIBING DRUGS
pick a fucking role for the guy, and let him do it.
you remind me of ChristFags who are all like "its a science conspiracy, you're depressed cause you're not close enough to God, you need the holy spirit!"
>>7438220 >More like anti-anti-insanity and anti-anti-ableist. Thanks i guess, but that's even more confusing. I don't think i'd last very long in these feminist meetings with that kind of language mutilation.
>>7438257 It's funny. You sound like you've lost faith in your religion, but on the other hand you put all your faith in your doctor who has no incentive to wean you out of the prescription.
>>7438257 Why do you assume that social disorders cannot be cured, and that the only way to treat them is with steroids, hormone or amphetamines. Did you even try any alternatives before becoming a slave to the pharma industrial complex?
>>7438338 >doctors educate me >putting faith in it
And I'm sorry, is it so wrong to assume that someone with 6+ years of college maybe kinda knows what they're talking about, and the last 50 or so years of scientific research might maybe be correct?
Don't try to derive me for having what you perceive is 'faith', whilst you think faith in religion is a good thing. Is faith good or bad? pick one, stick to it.
>>7438569 I didn't mention my position on religion. I just find it ironic that you trust your doctor 100%. The problem isn't the doctor's qualifications but the information he gives to his patients, which likely very selective. Unlike other scientific fields, psychology is hardly an exact science given how little we know of our brain despite years of study.
>>7438621 >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xbp6umQT58A >1.5M views Wow, i saw that video a year ago and it had like 10.000 views. It's great to see that videos like this make the rounds.
>>7438888 What do you mean funny? Funny how? What's funny about it? How the fuck is it funny, what the fuck is so funny about it? Tell me, tell me what's funny!
>>7439032 My favorite part of that whole video is the bitch just completely breaking down at the end in her own self-pity at how hard she just got told.
>>7439020 Oh no, actual scientists have absolutely no problem with castigating psychology/psychiatry/psychoanalysis as half crackpottery and half utilitarian, with very little understanding of the underlying mechanics or consilience with other disciplines.
Same goes for anthropology and sociology, really anything that uses the Standard Social Science Model (SSSM).
>>7439032 He comes across as an asshole. Yeah, he's right, but there's no need to be so aggravated and in your face about it. it's also rather sad that you have to be jewish and the grandson of a holocaust surviver to criticize the Israeli apartheid state. And even then the JIDF comes after you with vengeance.
>>7439679 >She whined about welfare and social security for years and then happily took it. [citation needed] And where's the hypocrisy in that? You're forced to pay into it and have no way of opting out. You're simply getting a tiny portion of your money back. There's no contradiction.
>>7433683 Wow, this video is very well done. I had to watch it twice to notice how full of shit it is. There are so many instances where he tries to make a connection between things where there is none.
First it mentions this Frankfurt school who somehow implanted the idea of feminism and racism into our society. Doesn't say how they did it, but they're communists, so they must be evil. They did this to attack western society because they believed in that way they could spread communism. Am I getting this right?
He doesn't mention that there are also right-wing narratives. And he completely disregards that cognitive bias could account for those narratives he mentions.
>>7442262 You watch that video, and you IMMEDIATELY put it down to left/right dictum. Ffs that's what the whole fucking video is about. It's not some right wing conspiracy against liberals.
>>7442707 >>7442707 Sorry anon, you are correct. He does attack the left purely there is no denying that. Wittle is a Neo-Con and one hell of a republican, and I do disagree with the man on a few things.
The point he makes is fantastic though, it could be applied to both left or right media as you say.
The Frankfurt school, I don't think all liberals are 'herp derp commie bastards'. I think few people really actually know what Marxism is/what socialism is. I think it's a standpoint for people who don't understand it to try to 'stand out', like its some big statement.
I remember whilst I was doing media studies (pre my red pill taking to Libertarianism) The Austrian was barely ever mentioned, and the couple times it was it was put in a bad light, but the Frankfurt school was always 100% go.
Its sad now education is more about indoctrination rather than actual educating of different view points.
>>7442262 Feminism does have strong ties to marxism. All the early feminists were marxists / fabian socialists, in fact the proto-feminisits, who pushed for letting women vote were also fabian socialists, they knew that women are more likely to fall for left-wing collectivism than men and that this would allow them to elect more left-leaning individuals. This is well documented and you can even check it for yourself on wikipedia.
>>7436685 He didn't , he knew it would introduce suffering to them. He didn't fear it because it represented danger to God, it brought all the futility of the desire of material world which is illusory, ephemeral and ultimately divides us.
@EmpireStateChris Both parties are full of warmongerers. It's not a contest between Bush and Obama, because both are horrible people deep down. The only one that can save our republic is Rep. Ron Paul :) look him up